In my intellect there is absolutely no motive to exceed the listed data. They force check the loads and all are Secure if used as written. Studying primers along with other approaches that are not actual devices for strain testing just isn't an correct evaluate of strain.

Quoted: H-335 can be a common .223 Rem powder and was oft proposed by ballistician Ed Matunas who did several reloading manuals being a powder that shot properly in a number of rifles.  Initially a armed service surplus powder, it is currently newly-created for Hodgdon.   Also, because it is really a ball powder, it meters significantly better than very long-grain IMR 3031.

Some matters are considered because they are demonstrably accurate, but all kinds of other issues are considered just because they are actually asserted consistently. ~ Thomas Sowell

Posted: 5/three/2016 7:47:48 AM EDT [#9] I have been seeking CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets.  Nevertheless working with it.  I can express that It appears to "feed" pretty well.  I have been working with my Hornady electronic powder evaluate/scale though Doing work up my loads.  The CFE223 feeds so rapid the powder measure are unable to properly meter it (the electronic one).  It presents me frequent above alarms.  Even using the mode button to slow down the metering more than environment it in "slow" doesn't get the job done.  I've not tried it during the typical powder measure nevertheless but be expecting it would be pretty constant. I did, sort of Blessed seriously, operate across an exceedingly accurate BLC2 load a pair range journeys back.

2) Most importantly, H335 is contrary to most all other powders in that it receives very unpleasant when loaded further than listed data on your bullet.

H335 is my visit powder for my Marlin 35 Rem. Lever gun enjoys these items. Haven't tried using it in almost every other caliber.

A broad selection of powders with the right burn off price can be utilized to enhance .308 Winchester velocity and precision.

Accurate, who will also be owned by Western Powder Co. get in touch with 2520 their "Camp Perry" powder thanks to its level of popularity amid check here Springfield M1A shooters. TAC is a bit faster than 2520 and will be a good match for an AR. In NOSLER's data, again for bolt guns, TAC did quite effectively. I also have W748 and Varget, but my SP favored the TAC load effectively more than enough to call it good and is now making it himself. He intends to implement that load for whitetail.

At first I assumed it could only be excellent for 223-sized cartridges. As I discovered more about this powder, I had been amazed While using the wide array of cartridges it can be compatible for, in the minimal 204 Ruger up for the 375 H&H! 

I only wish i could provide many of my oops'es in powder I've piled up. Was nearsighted initially spherical and have a LB of 332 at your home,Not sure what thats excellent for.Loaded about 20 rounds with that and determined which was out.

Bottom line is for plinking ammo, I wouldn't swap Unless of course you are looking to get a few much more FPS for a similar demand weight or preserve powder for a similar pace (will not likely conserve Substantially)

Posts: three,881 I hold the data in my reloading guide, I used to be just inquiring if anybody experienced in contrast both equally powders. Like I claimed I simply cannot seem to get H335 to shoot as precise and CFE223.   rebs

I use it really extensively in hunting loads mainly because I’m happy with minute of deer (typically a lot better with 3 shot teams  @ about an inch) accuracy plus maximum velocity.

CFE223 will give you much more velocity and you may insert N133 & a hundred thirty five together with AA2520 on your list of get it if you discover it